what is wrong with ADR?

I also do not like ADR that much. It is worth mentioning, that I am currently playing Convergence and the upcoming ADR would give me an edge over many other factions. Most arguments against ADR were already mentioned before, but for me the most important ones are the change in faction balance that is caused by the ADR. I do not like having an unfair advante over factions, who's ADR are much more restrictive than mine.

The transport and painting issues are secondary for me.

Personally I am pro ADR in a 2 list format. Certainly points provided by my predecessors are valid and there is and will be always a disproportion in the ADR-selective caster,

The only think i do not want right now is 3 list ADR becuase of logistical issues.

I'm definitly against ADR. Mostly because of the points writen above (Vitu$, Chomik).

ADR do not fulfill thier role of being support for less common choices of warcasters. Now they give too much flexibility and are making warcasters included in ADR to powerfull when they are not weak. Currently mercenaries are the best example.

I do think that the game is better balanced without them, especialy in 3 lists event.

The voting in the tournament thread may have a strategic element to it. If a player doesn't plan on using ADR anyway, he may want to vote against it to deny his opponents a potential advantage.

That said, I basically agree with others who do not find ADR a compelling option. It isn't enticing enough to encourage taking weaker warcasters while it feels like a cheap bonus for stronger ones, who would have been taken anyway.

I like ADR but because of Grymkin, CoC and Mercs in this edition I'm against. Game looks well balanced, but ADR doesn't

coming up again with this topic - anymore reasons? I know that many of you bring those arguments as one but I would be nice to see how many of you don't want ADRs.